Head to head
clonesite and UXMagic produce different artifacts. clonesite is a website cloner: give it the URL of a live site and it rebuilds the whole thing — real HTML, CSS, fonts, and responsive breakpoints, across every linked page — as working React + Tailwind code you preview free and pay for per export. UXMagic is an AI UI generator: give it a text prompt, a sketch, or a screenshot and it produces Figma-ready UI designs meant to be refined in a design tool. One ends with code you can deploy; the other ends with designs you hand to development.
UXMagic side
UXMagic is an AI UI design generator focused on the Figma workflow.
clonesite side
Paste one live URL and rebuild the site as editable React + Tailwind.
Proof, not claims
Every specimen below is a full multi-page clone — the exact thing one-page converters make you rebuild one page at a time. Preview and edit each one free before you pay.
At a glance
| Dimension | UUXMagic | clonesite |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI UI generator for Figma-ready designs | AI website cloner |
| Input | Text prompt, sketch, or screenshot | Live URL of an existing website |
| Output | Figma-ready UI screens, flows, and components | Working React + Tailwind code, exportable as production source |
| Source of truth | Your prompt or sketch — generates a new design | The live site's real HTML, CSS, fonts, and breakpoints |
| Multi-page handling | Generates screens and flows you assemble in Figma | Follows navigation and rebuilds every linked page |
| Pricing model | Subscription — monthly, with discounted annual billing | Free preview; pay per clone, no subscription |
| Best for | Turning ideas and sketches into refinable Figma designs | Turning an existing live site into deployable code |
The core difference
The fundamental split is what each tool treats as the source of truth. UXMagic generates designs from your intent — a prompt or sketch — so the output is a proposal: screens that look right but have no underlying working code, and no guarantee they match any real site's spacing or breakpoints. clonesite treats the live website as the source of truth: it reads the actual markup and styles at the URL and reproduces them as running code, so the clone behaves like the original at every screen size. That also defines the handoff: UXMagic's designs go to a developer next; clonesite's output is already the code, edited live in the browser and exported when you pay for the clone.
Pick the right tool
Two tools, two jobs. Here is the honest call on when each one wins — including when to reach for the other.
FAQ
clonesite rebuilds an existing live website from its URL into working React + Tailwind code. UXMagic generates new UI designs — Figma-ready screens, flows, and components — from text prompts, sketches, or screenshots. One outputs deployable code; the other outputs designs for a design tool.
UXMagic can take a screenshot as input, but it generates a new design influenced by that image — it does not read the site's real HTML, CSS, or responsive breakpoints. clonesite reads the live code directly, so the rebuilt site matches the original's structure and behavior at every screen size.
clonesite. Its output is React + Tailwind source you can edit in a live browser preview and export for deployment. UXMagic's output is Figma-ready designs, which still need a developer or another tool to become a working website.
Yes, they cover different stages. Teams use UXMagic to draft new screens in Figma, and clonesite to lift an existing site's structure into code. If a UXMagic design later ships as a live site, clonesite can clone that site too.
UXMagic is subscription-based, billed monthly with a discounted annual option. clonesite has no subscription: previewing and editing any clone is free, and you pay per clone only when exporting the source code. See clonesite's pricing page for current rates.